<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.aras.com/community/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BOM access control</title><link>https://www.aras.com/community/f/development/55325/bom-access-control</link><description>Hi Community, 
 We want to have differecnt access control to different BOM. For example, BOM A can only be accessed by person A, and BOM B can only be accessed by person B. Currently, we cannot seperate the accesses from different BOMs. Could anyone tell</description><dc:language>ja-JP</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: BOM access control</title><link>https://www.aras.com/community/thread/10554?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:56:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">916d3f7e-8ddc-42f8-8d45-380822f51406:eb03b20d-175e-4fbe-89e1-47787af1b742</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Lindinger</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Miranda, when you&amp;nbsp;describe bom A and bom B, are you referring to two different parts that have their own BOM (user A should see part A and its bom and user B should see part B and its bom)?&amp;nbsp;Or are describing a part that has a BOM and you want user A to see some parts in the BOM and user B to see to see other parts in the BOM? If it&amp;#39;s the first scenario, then in addition to MAC policies, you could also solve it with Teams access control (Team A and Team B) and setting the appropriate team on the item.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You also have option to use role-based permissions using the managed_by or owned_by item properties in conjunction with the Owner and Manager identities giving access on the permission. Use a permission where the Manager identity has the ability to Edit. Create two identity groups (Group A and Group B). Populate the identities with user A and user B respectively.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Dennis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: BOM access control</title><link>https://www.aras.com/community/thread/10553?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:01:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">916d3f7e-8ddc-42f8-8d45-380822f51406:97b376b1-7af0-4629-af82-3b49902c73ae</guid><dc:creator>AJ Sebastian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Miranda,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should be possible through MAC Policies, which work in addition to the standard permission model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take a look at the following blogs:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a id="" href="https://aras.com/en/blog/from-the-minerva-vault-how-to-create-secure-access-using-mac-policy-in-aras-innovator"&gt;https://aras.com/en/blog/from-the-minerva-vault-how-to-create-secure-access-using-mac-policy-in-aras-innovator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a id="" href="https://aras.com/en/blog/implementing-mac-policies"&gt;https://aras.com/en/blog/implementing-mac-policies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>