esteimle - Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:17 AM:
So I took over the onGet function for my custom BOM. I was trying to find away to return multiple items when I got stuck on this error. I can return, according to NASH, the same exact AML result generated two different ways. One way works and the other doesn't. The first way I try to use the built in item methods to create the results, this does not show the CIP part in the BOM list in innovator:
//these two items are what is going to get returned
Item res = this.getInnovator().newResult("");
XmlElement resultNd = (XmlElement) res.dom.SelectSingleNode("/*/*/*");
//get the source ID
XmlNode xSourceId = dom.SelectSingleNode("/Item/source_id/text()");
string sSourceId = xSourceId.Value;
Item bom = this.newItem("CIP Part BOM");
bom.setType("CIP Part BOM");
bom.setID("0FBE827DE1394675A68C13FA13C67F9C");
bom.apply();
bom.removeAttribute("isNew");
bom.removeAttribute("isTemp");
//create a fake CIP_PART here
Item res5 = this.newItem("CIP_PART");
string newid = getNewID();
res5.setID("A6F68F1E57C3432AA07E598F2468FFE2");
res5 = res5.apply();
res5.setProperty("part_number", "CT-ERIC-TEST");
res5.setProperty("manf_part_number", "00-333-0000");
res5.setProperty("manufacturer", "ACME");
res5.setProperty("description", "Road Runner Bait");
bom.setRelatedItem(res5);
resultNd.AppendChild(resultNd.OwnerDocument.ImportNode(bom.node, true));
/*
StreamWriter sw = null;
sw = File.CreateText("C:/Program Files (x86)/Aras/Innovator/Innovator/Server/temp/loge.txt");
sw.WriteLine("--- BEGIN LOG ---");
sw.WriteLine("bom: {0}", xNode);
sw.Flush();
sw.Close();
*/
return bom;
Now if on the other hand I generate the result using loadAML, everything works fine.
Item wtf = this.newItem("CIP Part BOM");
string aml = "<Result>"
+"<Item type =" CIP Part BOM " id =" 0FBE827DE1394675A68C13FA13C67F9C " >"
+"<related_id>"
+"<Item type =" CIP_PART " typeId =" 56D225FB95344D5C87128E28A366C307 " id =" A6F68F1E57C3432AA07E598F2468FFE2 " >"
+"<part_number>CT-ERIC-TEST</part_number>"
+"<manf_part_number>00-333-0000</manf_part_number>"//-
+"<manufacturer>ACME</manufacturer>"
+"<description>Road Runner Bait</description>"
+"</Item>"
+"</related_id>"
+"</Item>"
+"</Result>";
wtf.loadAML(aml);
return wtf;
Both of these methods of mine return the same AML response:
-<SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
-<SOAP-ENV:Body>
-<Result>
-<Item type =" CIP Part BOM " id =" 0FBE827DE1394675A68C13FA13C67F9C " >
-<related_id>
-<Item type =" CIP_PART " typeId =" 56D225FB95344D5C87128E28A366C307 " id =" A6F68F1E57C3432AA07E598F2468FFE2 " >
<part_number>CT-ERIC-TEST</part_number>
<manf_part_number>00-333-0000</manf_part_number>
<manufacturer>ACME</manufacturer>
<description>Road Runner Bait</description>
</Item>
</related_id>
</Item>
</Result>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
I even diff'd the two responses to make sure I wasn't missing something. Well I'm sure I'm missing something because they operate differently, but I can't tell what.
esteimle - Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:26 AM:
Ah needed to return res; not return bom; for the first method. After that change it works...
