This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DEVELOPERS FORUM - Aras 9.4 IOM problems

guido.chiavaccini - Saturday, October 5, 2013 12:42 PM:

Hi all,

I'm trying to develop some server methods on Innovator 9.4 with IOM api... but I found a strange behavior in the IOM.

Some examples:

 

  • The method "getRelationships()" applied to an Item does not return the Items under "Relationships" tag but the same Item on which I call that method.
  • The method "getRelatedItem()" called on a Relationship Item does not return the Related Item but the same Item on which I call that method.

 

Maybe my code is wrong... or maybe there are serious bugs in the 9.4 IOM library... Is there someone with same experience?

Thanks.



Amit Nawale - Friday, November 29, 2013 4:55 AM:

Hi Guido,

      Following code is working in my side.You can use this for reference.

       Innovator inn=this.getInnovator();

      string partAml=string.Format("<AML><Item type='Part' action='get' levels='1'><name>test</name></Item></AML>");

      Item partItem=inn.applyAML(partAml);

     if(partItem.isError()) return this;

     Item relationshipItm=partItem.getRelationships();

     // getRelationships() only return item that point to relationships of given Item.

     // If that Item doesn't have relationship then It will not point to any Item.

    // But item return by  getRelationships() and parent Item have same xml.

    // That means They share same xml and point to different node.

    //So if you try to return both item then it will always give same result.

    // if you want to check relationships then check getItemCount().

    //It count is zero then it does not have relationships.

     if(relationshipItm.getItemCount()>0)

     {

      for(int i=0;i<relationshipItm.getItemCount();i++)

       {

        Item relatedItm=relationshipItm.getItemByIndex(i).getRelatedItem();

        //write your code 

       }

     }

  return this;

 

  Thanks,

  Amit